SJRES 99
· 119th Congress
· Immigration
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services relating to "Removal of the Automatic Extension of Employment Authorization Documents".
Sponsor
Latest action
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 50. Record Vote Number: 111. (CR S2106)
Action timeline
Every recorded action on this bill, newest first. Stage badges color-code the legislative path.
Apr 29, 2026
floor
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 50. Record Vote Number: 111. (CR S2106)
Mar 24, 2026
committee
Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
Judiciary Committee
Mar 24, 2026
other
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 366.
Dec 10, 2025
introduced
Introduced in Senate
Dec 10, 2025
introduced
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Judiciary Committee
Roll-call votes
Floor votes recorded on this bill.
Roll call #111 — On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 99
April 29, 2026 · Motion to Proceed Rejected
47
Yea
50
Nay
3
Missed
D
44–0
(1 missed)
R
1–50
(2 missed)
I
2–0
view official roll-call →
Text versions
Each stage of the bill — official text published by GPO. Click any format to read on congress.gov / govinfo.
Changelog
ⓘ
How a bill moves through Congress. Each stage produces a new official text. The diff between them shows what changed at that step.
ih / is — Introduced in House / Senate. First filed version.rfh / rfs — Referred to a committee for review.rh / rs — Reported back by the committee to the floor (often with amendments — this is where most language changes happen).pcs / pch — Placed on Calendar for floor consideration.eh / es — Engrossed. Passed by the originating chamber. Text is now what was actually voted on.rdh / rds — Received by the other chamber.eah / eas — Engrossed Amendment. The other chamber passed an amended version.ath / ats — Agreed to. Both chambers settled on the same text.enr — Enrolled. Final reconciled text, sent to the President.pl — Public Law. Signed by the President. It's now law.pp — Public Print. Official printing post-enactment.
Most bills die before eh/es. Going from pcs → enr is the full path through both chambers.
ⓘ
How a bill moves through Congress. Each stage produces a new official text. The diff between them shows what changed at that step.
ih/is— Introduced in House / Senate. First filed version.rfh/rfs— Referred to a committee for review.rh/rs— Reported back by the committee to the floor (often with amendments — this is where most language changes happen).pcs/pch— Placed on Calendar for floor consideration.eh/es— Engrossed. Passed by the originating chamber. Text is now what was actually voted on.rdh/rds— Received by the other chamber.eah/eas— Engrossed Amendment. The other chamber passed an amended version.ath/ats— Agreed to. Both chambers settled on the same text.enr— Enrolled. Final reconciled text, sent to the President.pl— Public Law. Signed by the President. It's now law.pp— Public Print. Official printing post-enactment.
Most bills die before eh/es. Going from pcs → enr is the full path through both chambers.
Line-level diff between text versions of this bill — what actually changed at each legislative stage.
+34
−5
17 unchanged
--- Introduced (Senate)
+++ Placed on Calendar (Senate)
@@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
-[S.J. Res. 99 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
+[S.J. Res. 99 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]
<DOC>
+Calendar No. 366
119th CONGRESS
-1st Session
+2d Session
S. J. RES. 99
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5,
@@ -20,8 +21,13 @@
Ms. Rosen (for herself, Mr. Coons, Mr. King, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Durbin,
Mr. Van Hollen, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Padilla, Mr. Welch, Ms. Cortez Masto,
-and Mr. Bennet) introduced the following joint resolution; which was
-read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
+Mr. Bennet, and Ms. Warren) introduced the following joint resolution;
+which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
+
+March 24, 2026
+
+Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and
+placed on the calendar
_______________________________________________________________________
@@ -38,4 +44,27 @@
Services relating to ``Removal of the Automatic Extension of Employment
Authorization Documents'' (90 Fed. Reg. 48799 (October 30, 2025)), and
such rule shall have no force or effect.
-<all>
+
+Calendar No. 366
+
+119th CONGRESS
+
+2d Session
+
+S. J. RES. 99
+
+_______________________________________________________________________
+
+JOINT RESOLUTION
+
+Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5,
+United States Code, of the rule submitted by U.S. Citizenship and
+Immigration Services relating to ``Removal of the Automatic Extension
+of Employment Authorization Documents''.
+
+_______________________________________________________________________
+
+March 24, 2026
+
+Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and
+placed on the calendar
Cosponsors (11)
Members who signed on to support this bill.