S 1883
· 119th Congress
· International Affairs
DISRUPT Act
Sponsor
Latest action
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 99.
Action timeline
Every recorded action on this bill, newest first. Stage badges color-code the legislative path.
Jun 18, 2025
committee
Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Risch with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
Foreign Relations Committee
Jun 18, 2025
other
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 99.
Jun 05, 2025
committee
Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Foreign Relations Committee
May 22, 2025
introduced
Introduced in Senate
May 22, 2025
introduced
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Foreign Relations Committee
Text versions
Each stage of the bill — official text published by GPO. Click any format to read on congress.gov / govinfo.
Changelog
ⓘ
How a bill moves through Congress. Each stage produces a new official text. The diff between them shows what changed at that step.
ih / is — Introduced in House / Senate. First filed version.rfh / rfs — Referred to a committee for review.rh / rs — Reported back by the committee to the floor (often with amendments — this is where most language changes happen).pcs / pch — Placed on Calendar for floor consideration.eh / es — Engrossed. Passed by the originating chamber. Text is now what was actually voted on.rdh / rds — Received by the other chamber.eah / eas — Engrossed Amendment. The other chamber passed an amended version.ath / ats — Agreed to. Both chambers settled on the same text.enr — Enrolled. Final reconciled text, sent to the President.pl — Public Law. Signed by the President. It's now law.pp — Public Print. Official printing post-enactment.
Most bills die before eh/es. Going from pcs → enr is the full path through both chambers.
ⓘ
How a bill moves through Congress. Each stage produces a new official text. The diff between them shows what changed at that step.
ih/is— Introduced in House / Senate. First filed version.rfh/rfs— Referred to a committee for review.rh/rs— Reported back by the committee to the floor (often with amendments — this is where most language changes happen).pcs/pch— Placed on Calendar for floor consideration.eh/es— Engrossed. Passed by the originating chamber. Text is now what was actually voted on.rdh/rds— Received by the other chamber.eah/eas— Engrossed Amendment. The other chamber passed an amended version.ath/ats— Agreed to. Both chambers settled on the same text.enr— Enrolled. Final reconciled text, sent to the President.pl— Public Law. Signed by the President. It's now law.pp— Public Print. Official printing post-enactment.
Most bills die before eh/es. Going from pcs → enr is the full path through both chambers.
Line-level diff between text versions of this bill — what actually changed at each legislative stage.
+465
−23
58 unchanged
--- Introduced (Senate)
+++ Reported (Senate)
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
-[S. 1883 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
+[S. 1883 Reported in Senate (RS)]
<DOC>
+Calendar No. 99
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 1883
@@ -20,9 +21,16 @@
May 22, 2025
-Mr. Coons (for himself and Mr. McCormick) introduced the following
-bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign
-Relations
+Mr. Coons (for himself, Mr. McCormick, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Cornyn, Mr.
+Sullivan, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Mullin, and Ms. Slotkin) introduced the
+following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on
+Foreign Relations
+
+June 18, 2025
+
+Reported by Mr. Risch, with an amendment
+[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed
+in italic]
_______________________________________________________________________
@@ -37,6 +45,412 @@
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
+
+<DELETED>SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.</DELETED>
+
+<DELETED> This Act may be cited as the ``Defending International
+Security by Restricting Unacceptable Partnerships and Tactics Act'' or
+``DISRUPT Act''.</DELETED>
+
+<DELETED>SEC. 2. FINDINGS.</DELETED>
+
+<DELETED> Congress makes the following findings:</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (1) The People's Republic of China, the Russian
+Federation, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the Democratic
+People's Republic of Korea are each considered--</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (A) a foreign adversary (as defined in
+section 825(d) of the National Defense Authorization
+Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (Public Law 118-31; 137 Stat.
+322; 46 U.S.C. 50309 note));</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (B) a country of risk (as defined in
+section 6432(a) of the Servicemember Quality of Life
+Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for
+Fiscal Year 2025 (Public Law 118-159; 138 Stat. 2488;
+42 U.S.C. 7144b note)) for purposes of assessing
+counterintelligence risks posed by certain visitors to
+National Laboratories;</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (C) a foreign country of concern (as
+defined in section 10612(a) of the Research and
+Development, Competition, and Innovation Act (Public
+Law 117-167; 136 Stat. 1635; 42 U.S.C. 19221
+note));</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (D) a covered foreign country (as defined
+in section 164 of the Servicemember Quality of Life
+Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for
+Fiscal Year 2025 (Public Law 118-159; 138 Stat. 1818;
+10 U.S.C. 4651 note prec.)) for purposes of a
+prohibition on operation, procurement, and contracting
+relating to foreign-made light detection and ranging
+technology; and</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (E) a covered foreign country (as defined
+in section 1622 of the National Defense Authorization
+Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (Public Law 117-81; 135 Stat.
+2086; 10 U.S.C. 421 note prec.)) for purposes of a
+strategy and plan to implement certain defense
+intelligence reforms.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (2) According to the 2025 Intelligence Community
+Annual Threat Assessment, the United States faces an
+increasingly contested and dangerous global landscape as the
+four adversaries named in paragraph (1) deepen cooperation in a
+manner that--</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (A) reinforces threats posed by each such
+adversary individually; and</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (B) poses new challenges to the strength
+and power of the United States globally.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (3) Much of the cooperation referred to in
+paragraph (3) is occurring bilaterally, as the People's
+Republic of China, the Russian Federation, the Islamic Republic
+of Iran, and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea
+strengthen diplomatic, economic, and military ties in
+accordance with bilateral agreements, which include--</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (A) the Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation
+and Mutual Assistance between China and the Democratic
+People's Republic of Korea, signed at Beijing July 11,
+1961;</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (B) the Joint Statement on Comprehensive
+Strategic Partnership between the Islamic Republic of
+Iran and the People's Republic of China, issued on
+March 27, 2021;</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (C) the Joint Statement of the Russian
+Federation and the People's Republic of China on
+International Relations Entering a New Era and Global
+Sustainable Development, issued on February 4,
+2022;</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (D) the Treaty on Comprehensive Strategic
+Partnership between the Russian Federation and the
+Democratic People's Republic of Korea, signed at
+Pyongyang June 18, 2024;</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (E) the Iranian-Russian Treaty on
+Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, signed at Moscow
+January 17, 2025; and</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (F) traditional relations of friendship
+and cooperation between the Islamic Republic of Iran
+and the Democratic People's Republic of
+Korea.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (4) The most concerning forms of such cooperation
+with respect to the interests of the United States occur
+bilaterally in the realm of defense cooperation. Examples
+include the following:</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (A) The transfer and sharing of weapons
+and munitions. Since 2022, the Islamic Republic of Iran
+has supplied the Russian Federation with drones and
+ballistic missiles, and the Democratic People's
+Republic of Korea has provided artillery ammunition and
+ballistic missiles. Likewise, the Russian Federation
+has agreed to provide the Islamic Republic of Iran with
+Su-35 fighter jets and air defense
+assistance.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (B) The transfer and sharing of dual-use
+technologies and capabilities. Dual-use goods supplied
+by the People's Republic of China have enabled the
+Russian Federation to continue defense production in
+the face of wide-ranging sanctions and export controls
+intended to prevent the Russian Federation from
+accessing the necessary components to fuel its defense
+industry. In turn, reporting indicates that the Russian
+Federation has provided technical expertise on
+satellite technology to the Democratic People's
+Republic of Korea and is working closely with the
+People's Republic of China on air defense and submarine
+technology.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (C) Joint military activities and
+exercises. The military forces of the Democratic
+People's Republic of Korea are actively participating
+in the Russian Federation's invasion of Ukraine, and
+joint military exercises between the People's Republic
+of China and the Russian Federation are expanding in
+scope, scale, and geographic reach, including in close
+proximity to territory of the United States.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (D) Coordination on disinformation and
+cyber operations, including coordinated messaging aimed
+at denigrating and isolating the United States
+internationally.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (5) Adversaries of the United States are also
+cooperating in a manner that may circumvent United States and
+multilateral economic tools. Examples include the
+following:</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (A) The continued purchase by the People's
+Republic of China of oil from the Islamic Republic of
+Iran despite sanctions imposed by the Treasury of the
+United States on oil from the Islamic Republic of
+Iran.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (B) The veto by the Russian Federation of,
+and abstention by the People's Republic of China in a
+vote on, a United Nations Security Council resolution
+relating to monitoring United Nations Security Council-
+levied sanctions on the Democratic People's Republic of
+Korea.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (6) Adversaries of the United States are
+cooperating multilaterally in international institutions such
+as the United Nations and through expanded multilateral
+groupings, such as the Brazil-Russia-India-China-South Africa
+group (commonly known as ``BRICS''), to isolate and erode the
+influence of the United States.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (7) Such increased cooperation and alignment among
+the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation, the
+Islamic Republic of Iran, and the Democratic People's Republic
+of Korea, to an unprecedented extent, poses a significant
+threat to United States interests and national
+security.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (8) Such increasing alignment--</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (A) allows each such adversary to
+modernize its military more quickly than previously
+anticipated;</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (B) enables unforeseen breakthroughs in
+capabilities through the sharing among such adversaries
+of critical military technologies, which could erode
+the technological edge of the United States Armed
+Forces;</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (C) presents increasing challenges to
+strategies of isolation or containment against such
+individual adversaries, since the People's Republic of
+China, the Russian Federation, the Islamic Republic of
+Iran, and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea now
+provide critical lifelines to each other;</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (D) threatens the effectiveness of United
+States economic tools, as such adversaries cooperate to
+evade United States sanctions and export controls and
+seek to establish alternative payment mechanisms that
+do not require transactions in United States dollars;
+and</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (E) increases the chances of United States
+conflict or tensions with any one of such adversaries
+drawing in another, thereby posing a greater risk that
+the United States will have to contend with
+simultaneous threats from such adversaries in one or
+more theaters.</DELETED>
+
+<DELETED>SEC. 3. STATEMENT OF POLICY.</DELETED>
+
+<DELETED> It is the policy of the United States--</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (1) to disrupt or frustrate the most dangerous
+aspects of cooperation between and among the People's Republic
+of China, the Russian Federation, the Islamic Republic of Iran,
+and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, including by
+using the threat of sanctions and export controls, bringing
+such cooperation to light, and sharing information with United
+States allies and partners who may--</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (A) share the concerns and objectives of
+the United States; and</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (B) have influence over such
+adversaries;</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (2) to constrain such grouping from expanding its
+footprint or capabilities across the world; and</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (3) to prepare for the increasing likelihood that
+the United States could face simultaneous challenges or
+conflict with multiple such adversaries in multiple theaters,
+including by bolstering deterrence across all priority
+theaters.</DELETED>
+
+<DELETED>SEC. 4. TASK FORCES AND REPORTS.</DELETED>
+
+<DELETED> (a) Task Forces on Adversary Alignment.--</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (1) In general.--Not later than 60 days after the
+date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State, the
+Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Treasury, the
+Secretary of Commerce, the Director of National Intelligence,
+and the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency shall
+each--</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (A) establish a task force on adversary
+alignment; and</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (B) designate a point of contact on
+adversary alignment, who shall serve as the head of the
+task force for the applicable department, office, or
+agency.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (2) Requirements.--Each task force established
+pursuant to paragraph (1) shall--</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (A) comprise--</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (i) subject matter experts
+covering each of--</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (I) the People's Republic
+of China;</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (II) the Russian
+Federation;</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (III) the Islamic Republic
+of Iran; and</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (IV) the Democratic
+People's Republic of Korea;</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (ii) representatives covering all
+core functions of the department, office, or
+agency of the Secretary or Director
+establishing the task force; and</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (iii) a mix of analysts,
+operators, and senior management;</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (B) ensure that the task force members
+have the requisite security clearances and access to
+critical compartmented information streams necessary to
+assess and understand the full scope of adversary
+cooperation, including how events in one theater might
+trigger actions in another; and</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (C) not later than 180 days after the date
+of the enactment of this Act, submit to the Secretary
+or Director who established the task force, and to the
+appropriate committees of Congress, a report--
+</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (i) evaluating the impact of
+adversary alignment on the relevant operations
+carried out by the individual department,
+office, or agency of the task force;
+and</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (ii) putting forth recommendations
+for such organizational changes as the task
+force considers necessary to ensure the
+department, office, or agency of the task force
+is well positioned to routinely evaluate and
+respond to the rapidly evolving nature of
+adversary cooperation and the attendant
+risks.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (3) Quarterly interagency meeting.--Not less
+frequently than quarterly, the heads of the task forces
+established under this section shall meet to discuss findings,
+problems, and next steps with respect to adversary
+alignment.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (b) Report on Nature, Trajectory, and Risks of Bilateral
+Cooperation Between, and Multilateral Cooperation Among, Adversaries of
+the United States.--</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (1) In general.--Not later than 60 days after the
+date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National
+Intelligence, in coordination with the head of any Federal
+agency the Director considers appropriate, shall submit to the
+President, any Federal officer of Cabinet-level rank the
+Director considers appropriate, and the appropriate committees
+of Congress, a report on bilateral and multilateral cooperation
+among adversaries of the United States and the resulting risks
+of such cooperation.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (2) Elements.--The report required by paragraph
+(1) shall include the following:</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (A) A description of the current nature
+and extent of bilateral or multilateral cooperation
+among the People's Republic of China, the Russian
+Federation, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the
+Democratic People's Republic of Korea across the
+diplomatic, information, military, and economic
+spheres, and an assessment of the advantages that
+accrue to each such adversary from such
+cooperation.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (B) An assessment of the trajectory for
+cooperation among the adversaries described in
+subparagraph (A) during the 5-year period beginning on
+the date on which the report is submitted.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (C) An outline of the risks to the United
+States and allied diplomatic, military, intelligence,
+and economic operations, and broader security interests
+around the world, including the following:</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (i) The risk of technology
+transfer dramatically increasing the military
+capabilities of adversaries of the United
+States and its impact on the relative balance
+of United States and allied capabilities as
+compared to that of the adversary.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (ii) The risk posed to the United
+States by efforts made by adversaries to
+establish alternate payment systems, in
+particular with respect to the dominance of the
+United States dollar and the effectiveness of
+United States sanctions and export control
+tools.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (iii) The risk that an adversary
+of the United States might assist or otherwise
+enable another adversary of the United States
+in the event that one or more adversaries
+become party to a conflict with the United
+States.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (iv) The risk that adversary
+cooperation poses a growing threat to United
+States intelligence collection
+efforts.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (D) An evaluation of the vulnerabilities
+and tension points within such adversary bilateral or
+multilateral relationships, and an assessment of the
+likely effect of efforts by the United States to
+separate adversaries.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (3) Form.--The report submitted pursuant to
+paragraph (1) shall be submitted in classified form.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (c) Report on Strategic Approach.--</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the
+date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State and
+the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of
+the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, the Director of
+National Intelligence, and the Director of the Central
+Intelligence Agency, shall submit to the appropriate committees
+of Congress a report outlining the strategic approach of the
+United States to adversary alignment and the necessary steps to
+disrupt, frustrate, constrain, and prepare for adversary
+cooperation during the two-year period beginning on the date of
+the enactment of this Act.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (2) Elements.--The report required by paragraph
+(1) shall include the following:</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (A) A detailed description of the methods
+and tools available to the United States to disrupt the
+most dangerous elements of adversary cooperation,
+including the growing connectivity between the defense
+industrial bases of each adversary.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (B) A timeline for using diplomatic
+engagement and intelligence diplomacy--</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (i) to educate allies and partners
+about the increasing risk of adversary
+alignment; and</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (ii) to secure the support of
+allies and partners in combating adversary
+alignment.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (C) A plan for ensuring the integrity of
+United States methods of economic statecraft, including
+an assessment of the efficiency of the United States
+sanctions and export control enforcement apparatus and
+any accompanying resourcing requirements.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (D) A clear plan to bolster deterrence
+within the priority theaters of the Indo-Pacific
+region, Europe, and the Middle East by--</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (i) increasing United States and
+allied munitions stockpiles, particularly such
+stockpiles that are most critical for
+supporting frontline partners such as Israel,
+Taiwan, and Ukraine in the event of aggression
+by a United States adversary;</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (ii) facilitating collaborative
+efforts with allies for the co-production, co-
+maintenance, and co-sustainment of critical
+munitions and platforms required by the United
+States and allies and partners of the United
+States in the event of a future conflict with
+the People's Republic of China, the Russian
+Federation, the Islamic Republic of Iran, or
+the Democratic People's Republic of Korea;
+and</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (iii) more effectively using
+funding through the United States Foreign
+Military Financing program to support allied
+and partner domestic defense production that
+can contribute to deterrence in each such
+priority theater.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (E) A plan for digitizing and updating
+war-planning tools of the Department of Defense not
+later than 1 year after the date on which the report is
+submitted to ensure that United States war planners are
+better equipped to update and modify war plans in the
+face of rapidly evolving information on adversary
+cooperation.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (F) An assessment of the capability gaps
+and vulnerabilities the United States would face in
+deterring an adversary in the event that the United
+States is engaged in a conflict with another adversary,
+and a plan to work with allies and partners to address
+such gaps and vulnerabilities.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (3) Form.--The report required by paragraph (1)
+shall be submitted in classified form.</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (d) Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.--In this
+section, the term ``appropriate committees of Congress'' means--
+</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Select
+Committee on Intelligence, the Committee on Foreign Relations,
+the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Banking,
+Housing, and Urban Affairs, and the Committee on Commerce,
+Science, and Transportation of the Senate; and</DELETED>
+<DELETED> (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Permanent
+Select Committee on Intelligence, the Committee on Foreign
+Affairs, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on
+Financial Services, and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of
+the House of Representatives.</DELETED>
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
@@ -68,17 +482,17 @@
(D) a covered foreign country (as defined in
section 164 of the Servicemember Quality of Life
Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for
-Fiscal Year 2025 (Public Law 118-159; 138 Stat. 1818;
-10 U.S.C. 4651 note prec.)) for purposes of a
-prohibition on operation, procurement, and contracting
-relating to foreign-made light detection and ranging
-technology; and
+Fiscal Year 2025 (Public Law 118159; 138 Stat. 1818; 10
+U.S.C. 4651 note prec.)) for purposes of a prohibition
+on operation, procurement, and contracting relating to
+foreign-made light detection and ranging technology;
+and
(E) a covered foreign country (as defined in
section 1622 of the National Defense Authorization Act
-for Fiscal Year 2022 (Public Law 117-81; 135 Stat.
-2086; 10 U.S.C. 421 note prec.)) for purposes of a
-strategy and plan to implement certain defense
-intelligence reforms.
+for Fiscal Year 2022 (Public Law 11781; 135 Stat. 2086;
+10 U.S.C. 421 note prec.)) for purposes of a strategy
+and plan to implement certain defense intelligence
+reforms.
(2) According to the 2025 Intelligence Community Annual
Threat Assessment, the United States faces an increasingly
contested and dangerous global landscape as the four
@@ -88,7 +502,7 @@
individually; and
(B) poses new challenges to the strength and power
of the United States globally.
-(3) Much of the cooperation referred to in paragraph (3) is
+(3) Much of the cooperation referred to in paragraph (2) is
occurring bilaterally, as the People's Republic of China, the
Russian Federation, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the
Democratic People's Republic of Korea strengthen diplomatic,
@@ -298,8 +712,8 @@
Islamic Republic of Iran, and the Democratic People's
Republic of Korea across the diplomatic, information,
military, and economic spheres, and an assessment of
-the advantages that accrue to each such adversary from
-such cooperation.
+the advantages that accrue to each adversary from such
+cooperation.
(B) An assessment of the trajectory for cooperation
among the adversaries described in subparagraph (A)
during the 5-year period beginning on the date on which
@@ -308,10 +722,10 @@
and allied diplomatic, military, intelligence, and
economic operations, and broader security interests
around the world, including the following:
-(i) The risk of technology transfer
+(i) The risk of technology transfers
dramatically increasing the military
capabilities of adversaries of the United
-States and its impact on the relative balance
+States and the impact on the relative balance
of United States and allied capabilities as
compared to that of the adversary.
(ii) The risk posed to the United States by
@@ -354,12 +768,17 @@
dangerous elements of adversary cooperation, including
the growing connectivity between the defense industrial
bases of each adversary.
-(B) A timeline for using diplomatic engagement and
-intelligence diplomacy--
+(B) A timeline for using diplomatic engagement,
+intelligence diplomacy, security cooperation, and
+foreign assistance, as appropriate--
(i) to educate allies and partners about
-the increasing risk of adversary alignment; and
+the increasing risk of adversary alignment;
(ii) to secure the support of allies and
-partners in combating adversary alignment.
+partners in combating adversary alignment; and
+(iii) to assess and help address, as
+appropriate, the vulnerabilities and capability
+gaps of allies and partners to counter threats
+from adversary alignment.
(C) A plan for ensuring the integrity of United
States methods of economic statecraft, including an
assessment of the efficiency of the United States
@@ -414,4 +833,27 @@
the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Financial
Services, and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House
of Representatives.
-<all>
+Calendar No. 99
+
+119th CONGRESS
+
+1st Session
+
+S. 1883
+
+_______________________________________________________________________
+
+A BILL
+
+To require the executive branch to develop a whole-of-government
+strategy to disrupt growing cooperation among the People's Republic of
+China, the Russian Federation, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the
+Democratic People's Republic of Korea, which are the foremost
+adversaries of the United States, and mitigate the risks posed to the
+United States.
+
+_______________________________________________________________________
+
+June 18, 2025
+
+Reported with an amendment
Cosponsors (12)
Members who signed on to support this bill.