S 1872
· 119th Congress
· Commerce
Critical Infrastructure Manufacturing Feasibility Act
Sponsor
Latest action
Held at the desk.
Action timeline
Every recorded action on this bill, newest first. Stage badges color-code the legislative path.
Nov 10, 2025
floor
Received in the House.
Nov 10, 2025
floor
Held at the desk.
Nov 07, 2025
floor
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Nov 04, 2025
passed
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Nov 04, 2025
passed
Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S7904; text: CR S7904)
Oct 16, 2025
committee
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Cruz with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 119-81.
Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
Oct 16, 2025
other
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 192.
Jun 25, 2025
committee
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
May 22, 2025
introduced
Introduced in Senate
May 22, 2025
introduced
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
Text versions
Each stage of the bill — official text published by GPO. Click any format to read on congress.gov / govinfo.
Changelog
ⓘ
How a bill moves through Congress. Each stage produces a new official text. The diff between them shows what changed at that step.
ih / is — Introduced in House / Senate. First filed version.rfh / rfs — Referred to a committee for review.rh / rs — Reported back by the committee to the floor (often with amendments — this is where most language changes happen).pcs / pch — Placed on Calendar for floor consideration.eh / es — Engrossed. Passed by the originating chamber. Text is now what was actually voted on.rdh / rds — Received by the other chamber.eah / eas — Engrossed Amendment. The other chamber passed an amended version.ath / ats — Agreed to. Both chambers settled on the same text.enr — Enrolled. Final reconciled text, sent to the President.pl — Public Law. Signed by the President. It's now law.pp — Public Print. Official printing post-enactment.
Most bills die before eh/es. Going from pcs → enr is the full path through both chambers.
ⓘ
How a bill moves through Congress. Each stage produces a new official text. The diff between them shows what changed at that step.
ih/is— Introduced in House / Senate. First filed version.rfh/rfs— Referred to a committee for review.rh/rs— Reported back by the committee to the floor (often with amendments — this is where most language changes happen).pcs/pch— Placed on Calendar for floor consideration.eh/es— Engrossed. Passed by the originating chamber. Text is now what was actually voted on.rdh/rds— Received by the other chamber.eah/eas— Engrossed Amendment. The other chamber passed an amended version.ath/ats— Agreed to. Both chambers settled on the same text.enr— Enrolled. Final reconciled text, sent to the President.pl— Public Law. Signed by the President. It's now law.pp— Public Print. Official printing post-enactment.
Most bills die before eh/es. Going from pcs → enr is the full path through both chambers.
Line-level diff between text versions of this bill — what actually changed at each legislative stage.
+8
−83
35 unchanged
--- Reported (Senate)
+++ Engrossed (Senate)
@@ -1,38 +1,15 @@
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
-[S. 1872 Reported in Senate (RS)]
+[S. 1872 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]
<DOC>
-Calendar No. 192
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 1872
-[Report No. 119-81]
-
-To direct the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a study on the
-feasibility of manufacturing in the United States products for critical
-infrastructure sectors, and for other purposes.
-
_______________________________________________________________________
-IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
-
-May 22, 2025
-
-Ms. Ernst (for herself and Ms. Blunt Rochester) introduced the
-following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on
-Commerce, Science, and Transportation
-
-October 16, 2025
-
-Reported by Mr. Cruz, with an amendment
-[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed
-in italic]
-
-_______________________________________________________________________
-
-A BILL
+AN ACT
To direct the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a study on the
feasibility of manufacturing in the United States products for critical
@@ -40,54 +17,6 @@
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
-
-<DELETED>SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.</DELETED>
-
-<DELETED> This Act may be cited as the ``Critical Infrastructure
-Manufacturing Feasibility Act''.</DELETED>
-
-<DELETED>SEC. 2. STUDY ON CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANUFACTURING IN THE
-UNITED STATES.</DELETED>
-
-<DELETED> (a) Study.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the
-enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce shall conduct a study
-to--</DELETED>
-<DELETED> (1) identify, within each critical infrastructure
-sector, any product that is in high demand and is being
-imported due to a manufacturing, material, or supply chain
-constraint in the United States;</DELETED>
-<DELETED> (2) analyze the costs and benefits of
-manufacturing in the United States any product identified under
-paragraph (1), including any effects on--</DELETED>
-<DELETED> (A) jobs, employment rates, and labor
-conditions in the United States; and</DELETED>
-<DELETED> (B) the cost of the product;</DELETED>
-<DELETED> (3) identify any product identified under
-paragraph (1) that feasibly may be manufactured in the United
-States; and</DELETED>
-<DELETED> (4) analyze the feasibility of, and any
-impediments to, manufacturing any product identified under
-paragraph (3) in--</DELETED>
-<DELETED> (A) a rural area;</DELETED>
-<DELETED> (B) an industrial park; or</DELETED>
-<DELETED> (C) an industrial park in a rural
-area.</DELETED>
-<DELETED> (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 18 months after
-the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall--</DELETED>
-<DELETED> (1) submit to Congress a report containing the
-results of the study required by subsection (a), with
-recommendations relating to manufacturing in the United States
-products identified under subsection (a)(3); and</DELETED>
-<DELETED> (2) make the report available to the public on the
-website of the Department of Commerce.</DELETED>
-<DELETED> (c) Limitation on Authority.--This section may not be
-construed to provide the Secretary of Commerce with authority to compel
-a person to provide information described in this section.</DELETED>
-<DELETED> (d) Definition of Critical Infrastructure Sector.--In this
-section, the term ``critical infrastructure sector'' means each of the
-16 designated critical infrastructure sectors identified in
-Presidential Policy Directive 21 of February 12, 2013 (Critical
-Infrastructure Security and Resilience).</DELETED>
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
@@ -141,26 +70,22 @@
(d) Limitation on Authority.--This section may not be construed to
provide the Secretary of Commerce with authority to compel a person to
provide information described in this section.
-Calendar No. 192
+Passed the Senate November 4, 2025.
+
+Attest:
+
+Secretary.
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 1872
-[Report No. 119-81]
-
_______________________________________________________________________
-A BILL
+AN ACT
To direct the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a study on the
feasibility of manufacturing in the United States products for critical
infrastructure sectors, and for other purposes.
-
-_______________________________________________________________________
-
-October 16, 2025
-
-Reported with an amendment
Cosponsors (2)
Members who signed on to support this bill.